I didn't want to write "Survival of the Slickest".
The research, analysis, and writing were emotionally draining because of a convoluted legal system that had no relationship to my perceptions of its purpose.
I didn't want to devote my valuable time and money to promote the truth about citizen abuse in return for expected citizen apathy. I didn't want to face the probable attacks from a group of businessmen who I was trying to put back on track. There was no logical reason to take my valuable time away from other activities that I considered more constructive and more interesting.
But I could not justify the costly risks that would be required to continue pursuing my lifelong goals. There would be no guarantee that the legal trade would leave me alone long enough to enjoy the fruits of success that might result from my continued labors and dreams.
It would be more productive to warn the consumer public. The legal trade has institutionalized their anti-American business practices without any serious challenges, even while many individuals and groups provide unwarranted praise for an illusion of justice that makes this profession respectable.
Politicians who are supposed to be representative watchdogs ignore any serious attempts to solve the real problems because they have more important goals. They must concentrate on attracting large sums of money to pay for thier valuable campaigns. When they go to work, they work with the legal trade that helps keep them in business.
Anyone who does not want to face these truths will hate "Survival of the Slickest". That's OK, because these people have no value to society.